KING KONG - The Annotated Novelization
KING KONG
The Annotated Novelization by Delos W. Lovelace
By Micah Swanson Harris
A Minor Profit Press
346 pgs
In the September of
1932, production of the film King Kong began at RKO Studios in Hollywood.
Conceived by studio executive and producer, Merian C. Cooper and directed by
Ernest B. Shoedsack, it would become one of the most successful films of all
time. Prior to that first day’s shooting, the story had been bandied around
between Cooper and British thriller writer, Edgar Wallace. Tragically, Wallace
died of pneumonia after only having penned a rough outline of a script whose
elements would be ultimately discarded as production continued. After Wallace,
Cooper drafted James Creelman, a skilled action writer along with a few other
scribes. Appreciating what Creelman had written, Cooper still felt the script
needed more romance. To that end he recruited Shoedsack’s wife, Ruth Rose. Rose
had been an actress back in New Jersey before signing on with several wildlife
expeditions; which is how she met Shoedsack.
Of course, the
studio was eager to capitalize on any aspect of marketing they could offer the
public and to that end, RKO Chief, David O’Selznic authorized a book
novelization. A few big-name authors were suggested, but Cooper made it
possible for his friend, New York based writer, Delos W. Lovelace to get the
assignment. Working from a Rose script still being altered, Lovelace began
writing the following month, October. He would finish in November and his book
would be published in hardback in December by Grosset and Dunlap; a full two
months before the film’s release on 2 March 1933 at the Radio City Music Hall.
The movie’s final
version and the book differ in quite a few scenes, characterization, prehistoric
creatures and story structure. Now Kong enthusiast, Micah Harris, has taken it
upon himself to detail those differences in this wonderful, comprehensive
volume which no King Kong fan should be without. This reviewer, another Kong
fanatic, had read Lovelace’s book ages ago and found it fascinating to see what
the writer had added and how it either complimented the efforts of Creelman and
Rose, or how departed from their narrations. It is easy to see, thanks to
Harris, that Lovelace was focused on writing believable characters and excelled
in the dialogue bits that fleshed them out. Whereas he was not a pulp writer
and the big New York City rampage and finale atop the Empire State Building
gets sadly short-changed.
If you love movies in general, we think you’ll appreciate the work that went into this literary cinematic dissection. Nice going, Micah Harris, from one Kong fan to another.
Comments
Post a Comment